Where elephants move and farmers live: mapping the corridors that connect them

Project Update

Publish date: June 16, 2026

Prioritised wildlife corridors and conflict hotposts, Kenya
Prioritised wildlife corridors and conflict hotposts, Kenya / Photo: CETRAD / cf Map

Part of the project

Wildlife Corridors: Connecting Ecosystems, Reducing Conflict

Wildlife Corridors: Connecting Ecosystems, Reducing Conflict

Where elephants move and farmers live: mapping the corridors that connect them

Project Update

Part of the project

Wildlife Corridors: Connecting Ecosystems, Reducing Conflict

Wildlife Corridors: Connecting Ecosystems, Reducing Conflict

Publish date: June 16, 2026

When community members from across Kenya's Upper Ewaso Ng'iro Basin gathered to map wildlife movement routes, the maps kept lining up. Independently, across different groups, participants pointed to the same places — the same bottlenecks, the same conflict zones, the same fragmented corridors. The map that emerged was not a surprise to the people who live within it, but rather a confirmation.

A basin under pressure 

The Upper Ewaso Ng'iro Basin is one of Kenya's most ecologically significant landscapes, linking protected areas, forests, and community lands across a vast network of wildlife movement routes. that network is, however, fracturing. Settlement expansion and agricultural encroachment are narrowing the corridors that elephants and other wildlife depend on to move between habitats. As space shrinks, contact between wildlife and farming communities increases, and so does conflict. 

Human-elephant conflict is not simply an inconvenience. Crop raids can erase an entire season's harvest overnight. The financial and emotional toll on farming families is heavy, and it erodes trust in conservation. Addressing it requires more than reactive mitigation. It requires understanding where and why it happens and intervening at the source. 

Mapping what communities already know 

From 5 to 7 May 2026, the Wyss Academy and CETRAD convened an Integrated Wildlife Corridor Protection and Human-Elephant Conflict Mitigation Workshop, bringing together community participants from 12 focal sites alongside county government officers from Isiolo and Meru, Kenya Wildlife Service personnel, conservation NGOs, and technical consultants. 

The workshop validated Participatory GIS mapping data on wildlife movement routes and conflict hotspots, reviewed scientific evidence and regional case studies, and built a shared framework for prioritising conservation action. Two wildlife corridors were identified as highest priority for immediate protection. Two major conflict hotspots were flagged for urgent mitigation. 

What the process confirmed was as important as what it produced. Communities and technical experts consistently identified the same bottlenecks. Local ecological knowledge, accumulated over generations of living alongside wildlife, aligned directly with scientific analysis. That convergence strengthened both the credibility of the findings and community ownership of the proposed interventions. 

Prioritised wildlife corridors and conflict hotposts, Kenya
Prioritised wildlife corridors and conflict hotposts, Kenya / Photo: CETRAD / cf Map
In East Africa, wildlife and herds of livestock share the same resources
In East Africa, wildlife and herds of livestock share the same resources

Where corridors break, conflict follows The spatial relationship between blocked corridors and recurring conflict is not coincidental. Where wildlife movement is constrained, animals concentrate. Where they concentrate near farmland, conflict follows. Restoring corridor connectivity is therefore not only an ecological intervention. It can also help ease the conflict itself  

The workshop produced four concrete outcomes: validated priority corridors and conflict hotspots; stakeholder consensus on intervention priorities; strengthened collaboration between communities, county governments, Kenya Wildlife Service, and conservation partners; and identified specific next steps including corridor demarcation, community-based conflict mitigation, and long-term monitoring. 

Proposed corridor boundaries and interventions will continue to be refined through ongoing stakeholder engagement and county planning processes. 

A model worth replicating

The approach developed here, combining participatory GIS, scientific analysis, and structured multi-stakeholder dialogue, offers a practical framework for landscapes across Kenya and East Africa facing similar pressures. Conservation planning that starts with community knowledge, tests it against scientific evidence, and builds institutional consensus around the findings does not just produce better maps. It produces plans that communities and governments are invested in implementing. 

It is also why the Wyss Academy treats planning here as a shared task—grounded in evidence and built with the people who live in these landscapes as genuine partners, not just consulted parties. This work is part of Hub East Africa's focus on wildlife connectivity and coexistence. 

An article co-written by Judith Koskey & Daria Vuistiner. Edited by Predrag Tripkovìc.